NIVEA vs Ponds: Who Won the Battle for Blue in Court?

2 Minutes Read
Nivea and Ponds
NIVEA and Ponds in Court Battle for Blue. | Representational Image: Unsplash

Summary

Nivea and Ponds engage in a legal battle over skincare practices. Delhi High Court restricts HUL from comparing Ponds to Nivea.

Popular moisturizer brands Nivea and Ponds have been in a legal fight for more than three years over multiple issues such as oil content, unfair market practices and hydration. They even battled for the colour blue! 

Beiersdorf, a global skincare company and the manufacturer of Nivea creams, filed a case against Hindustan Unilever (which makes Ponds) in the Delhi High Court in 2021. It accused Ponds’ salespersons were engaged in unfair market practices at malls all over the city.

According to media reports, Beiersdorf AG told the court that Ponds’ sales representatives would apply NIVEA’s cream on one hand of a customer and Ponds on the other. Then they would ask the customer to see through a magnifying glass to demonstrate that NIVEA’s cream left more residue than Ponds’ super light gel. 

Advertisement

Ponds’ makers, however, said they were only using a generic blue tub without NIVEA’s branding. However, NIVEA makers claimed that such comparison was misleading and unfair. It also claimed that the unmarked blue tub looked similar to the tub in which NIVEA’ cream comes and it also had the same shade of blue.

Beiersdorf AG also claimed that Ponds was making “an inherently wrong comparison” between a “heavy cream” category of Nivea goods and a lighter cream/gel-based Ponds product, reports said.

In response, Hindustan Unilever argued that they utilized a generic “blue tub” without NIVEA branding. They also claimed that NIVEA did not have an exclusive right to the color blue.

Also Read: How a Woman Lost Rs 2 Crore LIC Claim After Husband Died of Heart Attack

What Delhi High Court Said?

The Delhi High Court has restrained HUL from advertising or carrying out marketing campaigns comparing Ponds creams to NIVEA products. The court concluded that Ponds’ marketing exercise was “prima facie misleading and disparaging”. 

On the use of blue colour tub for marketing by Ponds’ salespersons, the High court didn’t accept HUL’s argument. It said that the objective behind the use of a blue tub in exactly the same distinctive colour was to make the customer draw association to NIVEA’s products. 

Want to learn the art and science of managing your money? The 1% Club can help. Details here

Share the Post:

Explore Money School

Explore Money School

Leave a Reply

Also read other articles

What is the difference between Claim Settlement Ratio and Incurred Claim Ratio in Health Insurance?

Claim Settlement Ratio and Incurred Claim Ratio are not same. And one of them do not apply to Health Insurance companies.

Income Tax Rebate U/S 87A Denied for Short-Term Capital Gains In New Tax Regime: Report

Taxpayers face denied Section 87A rebates on short-term capital gains after recent ITR utility update, conflicting with Income Tax Act.

All you need to know about Dixon Technologies, the company producing Google Pixel 8 in India

Dixon Technologies, founded in 1993 by Sunil Vachani, is a prominent contract manufacturer in India.

NITI Aayog’s Bold Vision for 2030: $500 Billion Electronics Production, 6 Million Jobs

NITI Aayog's report outlines a $500 billion electronics production target by 2030, aiming to create six million jobs.

Over 2 Lakh People Have Taken

Control of Their Financial Freedom

Financial Independence is the superpower
that can open a whole new world
of possibilities for you.

Join The 1% Club to know how it's done

Discover more from The 1% News

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Discover more from The 1% News

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Subscribe Now

Subscription Form